TSHFT Update Part 3

TSHFT

We’re all here having a great time at TSHFT, in fun Seattle. The event had a bit of a late start due to a snafu with ToF as we were told, but, got rolling. There are some brutal lists here, and some excellent players. 10 barbed heirodules!!! Yikes, Nids are back in a big way. There are more flyrants than you can throw a stick at.

PlayeRs are hungry for those ITC points! We’ve got a ton of people looking for top spots with their respective armies.

Of Team Zero Comp, Frankie got beat by Jeremy vessierre’s White Scars, and JY2 had some incredibly bad luck and got beaten, too. Everyone else won, Ben C. knocked Tastey Taste’s Green Tide Orks in a super close game.

We’ll keep you updated! Got to get back to my game.

UPDATE:

Day 1 is done and behind us. The competition has been fierce. Of Team Zero Comp, only Ben Cromwell with his Eldar\Dark Eldar and Reecius with his Space Wolves are still undefeated. Frankie’s Dark Eldar had a rough day, going 1 and 2, as did JY2 and his Necrons. INcontroL and his Nids are 2 and 1 as is GTA and his Seer Council with Lynx.

Tomorrow will filter out the remaining undefeated players! Abuse Puppy is in first with Taudar at 30/30 pts, Reecius is in second with 29/30, JP is third with FMC Tzeentch Daemons, Jeremy V. Is 4th with White Scars and Space Wolves.

UPDATE: TSHFT is done and behind us! It was a great time. Congrats to Abuse Puppy who won it with a perfect 50/50, and who also smoked me to get a spot on Team Zero Comp! The rest of the team did well. Frankie and Jim went 2-3, iNcontroL, and Raw Dogger went 3-2, Reece, Ben S., and GTA went 4-1, and Ben C. Went 4-0-1, winning the pool from the team and taking home a few hundred bucks! More to come, but wanted to post a quick update before we went home.

author avatar
Reece Robbins President
Co-founder of Frontline Gaming, and creator of the ITC, Reece Robbins has been a pillar of the tabletop community for over two decades. From developing Blood Throne to launching industry-leading hobby products and major events like the LVO, his career is defined by innovation and a lifelong passion for gaming since the 80s. Today, he remains a very active community organizer and business leader dedicated to the growth of the hobby.

52 thoughts on “TSHFT Update Part 3”

  1. I’m still livid at the comment on how the TOs purposely made shitty tables with shitty terrain. Also whats up with ToF, it’s annoying having 70 people huddle up on one guy with a laptop. Went no printed pairings or a projector.

    1. Well, the terrain thing is the TO’s choice, and we can always help them out with terrain, too. I would have liked to see a bit morw, though. And the no projector/print outs is an easy fix, and it would be nice to have pairings a bit note accessible, I agree.

      1. Projector/Print is TO call, but everyone with a smart phone can see pairings and self score. Doesn’t really get more accessible than that. Bummer for Chip if people are huddling around a single laptop … he should make sure that TO uses it right, heh.

        1. Not sure if the error is with operator or software, but there were no pairings on TOF. So players couldn’t see the pairings or score themselves. The organizers haven’t been using TOF to score the tournament after the screw up in the first round.

  2. I wonder if there’s a numbers nerd out in the 40K community somewhere that could put together an Excel spreadsheet with formulas built in that would calculate points and whatnot?

    Pairings might still have to be done by hand, but in a tournament with around 60 or less, how bad can that be. Making index cards for players can help (a traditional low-tech method employed at Chess tournaments in the days before laptops) with pairing by hand.

    1. TOF provides tournament tracking — they are not a format. In fact they provide tournament tracking to LVO/BAO and the LVO format is one of the few formats ToF supports out of the box.

        1. User error on TOs’ part is a real thing, as is knee-jerking to bus the software. Alternatively, it might not be user friendly enough. But it’s been used extensively without error in LVO format events, and objectively is just simple software.

      1. It was a pretty rad-looking army, yeah. CTA allies aren’t nearly as hard to rationalize as people think- I mean, there’s a canon story with the Imperium raising Tyranids to try and study/control them in IA4, so why not Tau?

    1. Great! Was it pure Exorcist-spam or was it allies also? I actually think they’re quite strong, and I was taken a bit off guard the first time I faced them. I expect the same is true for most people since they’re so rare!

        1. I dunno if you can call an army with 1000pts of Sisters and 800pts of Knights a Knight army with any honesty. I mean, those other models are kinda actually important, too.

          1. Pretty much exactly what Tron said but lets not take it away from AbusePuppy that he had to face off against tough opponents (no bias there, we played each other for Round 5).

            He just tailored an army that was built for TSHFT Terrain and played to his strength which is Target Priority.

  3. Frankie, I was wondering if you had pictures your DE army anywhere. I saw a few models, but didn’t get a chance to see the whole army. Also, what studio did you use to get em painted? The few I saw were really cool.

  4. I was running TSHFT 40k after the first round, and I want to do some clarifications on here since there seems to be quite a bit of emphasis on ToF on here. I run lots of fantasy events so when ToF crashed (could have been user error, not sure) I offered to jump in and run both fantasy and 40k with warscore.net’s software which I was familiar with.

    Did we abandon the software too soon? Possibly, but when the first guy had it crash (for whatever reason) after getting our 40k side going about 1 hour late, it wasn’t really worth the risk to attempt it again when I had a piece of software I knew worked, especially since the crash apparently dropped all the previously paired matchups and I already knew I’d have to manually rematch all the players as the results sheets came in.

    Do we think that we’ll never use ToF again? No, it looks like it offers some very neat options on tracking game by game stats which is interesting, so I’d like to try it out and make some assessments for myself, but that wasn’t something I was prepared to do in the middle of an actively running tournament.

    As far as having a projector or a printer, that was definitely a big mistake (but I was anticipating running a 18 person fantasy tournament, not a 56 person 40k one!) that will be corrected for the next event.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top