Scott Devall has the report for the largest Australian ITC event complete with army and LoW breakdowns as well as a rules showcase of how they handle slow paying in Australian 40k. (Hint: It may involve giant spiders with mana bars).
Hey guys, Scott Devall here from The 2nd Wave Podcast with a TO’s report for the Australian Warhammer 40K ITC 2016 Championships held at Cancon 2017 on the 27th to the 29th of January at EPIC in Canberra. This one is going to have plenty of meat to it to digest and give solid perspective of the Australian 40K Scene.
Overview
The tournament was 1850 Points with 8 Games being played over 3 Days. This has been the traditional format for the Main 40K tournament at Cancon in previous years. The format was almost identical to that of the ITC with a few adjustments to better suit the Australian Tournament scene, with a Super Heavy/Gargantuan Creature Lord of War choices cap in place for the tournament. The Missions that were in use were my own modified missions that are based off the Standard ITC Missions that are better suited for the Australian Tournament Scene and using the Straight ITC FAQ with our own rulings on the Interim ITC FAQ rulings. The event reach 80 Players out of a 96 Player capacity, which was not only the largest ITC Formatted event here in Australia to date, but a 66% increase on the previous year’s attendance for the Main 40K tournament at Cancon. It was a personal goal of mine to get to 80 players for this tournament and I’m quite humbled by the turn out as a TO and member of the 40K community.
Format
The format for the Championships was straight ITC apart from a Super Heavy/Gargantuan Creature Lord of War points cap. Now, I have been slowly increasing this cap over the past year and a half at the ITC events I have run as I have perceived that the scene is slowly being more aware of them and factoring in to deal with them with their lists. The points cap for them was that you can spend up to 650 Points per SH/GC model in your army and up to 900 Points per army. This allowed for units of 2 Stormsurges as well as 2 Imperial Knights of any variety in armies, plus allowing for the usual suspects of both forms of Wraithknights and some unusual ones, like Astra Militarum Stormlords and Big Mek Stompas. There was a total of 30 Super Heavy/Gargantuan Creature Lords of War present at the tournament and here is the breakdown of what was present on a per model basis:
- Chaos Imperial Knights – 3
- Imperial Knights – 10
- Renegade Knights – 1
- Wraithknight – 6
- Skathach Wraithknight – 2
- Stormsurges – 5
- Stormlord – 1
- Big Mek Stompa – 1
Meta
The meta for the Championships was quite diverse and was the same level of diversity that I have seen at my previous tournaments. So here is the breakdown of the meta as per Primary ITC Factions:
- Astra Militarum – 5
- Blood Angels – 4
- Chaos Daemons – 7
- Chaos Space Marines – 7
- Cult Mechanicus – 3
- Dark Angels – 7
- Dark Eldar – 2
- Eldar – 7
- Eldar Corsairs – 1
- Genestealer Cult – 2
- Harlequins – 1
- Imperial Knights – 2
- Inquisition – 1
- Militarum Tempestus – 1
- Necrons – 2
- Orks – 4
- Skitarii – 1
- Space Marines – 11
- Space Wolves – 4
- Tau Empire – 6
- Tyranids – 2
Missions
The missions that were in use for the Championships were ITC Missions that were modified to better suit the Australian Scene. We more often play Battlepoint missions at tournaments rather than Win/Loss missions at tournaments which the base ITC missions are geared towards.
So, I decided to modify the ITC missions to have a sliding scale in terms of the ‘degree of victory’. I have been running these missions for about a year now and they’ve been working the exact way that I had created them to do as well as getting a great response from players who are playing these missions. Here’s a quick run through of how the missions are modified:
- Increased the Mission Points total from 11 point maximum to a 20 point maximum
- Dawn of War Mission – 8pts with a points differential table
- Modified Maelstrom – 8pts with a points differential table
- Bonus Points – Two 1pt Objectives, One 2pt Objective
- Total: 20 Mission Points
The points differential tables for the Dawn of War Missions are different depending on what mission is being played and the points differential table for the Modified Maelstrom Missions stay the same for all 6 missions. With these tables, it has showed the ‘degree of victory’ from how close or not so close the games are.
With the Aus Championships being an 8 Round tournament, two of the missions were repeated. Now, I didn’t make which two missions would be repeated public until the event itself, however the missions that were repeated was Modified ITC Mission 3 and 6. I did change up the order of the missions, which started with Mission 6, then Missions 1 through 6 and finishing with Mission 3. So Kill Points and Crusade were duplicated because those were the 2 out of the 3 possibly choices that would make for interesting matches, with the other possible choice being Mission 1.
Slow Play
Slow play is something that has been discussed as being an issue with the game at the moment. With armies getting free point either through Summoning, Formations, etc, games aren’t just straight 1850 points anymore, they’re sometime 2000 points or more depending on how many free units are on the table and such. From this comes the issue of Slow play. Over here in Australia, at least from the other East Coast events that I know of, we combat this for the most part using a Slow Play Table, which assigns a number of points to a player depending on what turn the games ends unnaturally on. Depending on the event, these points will vary, but for the Championships, here’s the points for Slow Play:
- Turn 1 – 12
- Turn 2 – 8
- Turn 3 – 6
- Turn 4 – 3
- Turn 5 – 1
- Turn 6+ – 0
For every 8 slow play points that a player accumulates, they a penalised 10 Battlepoints. However, as a TO, I tend to wait for a trend to appear so that I am not hitting players who aren’t at fault for slow playing and depending on the number of rounds, will depend of how many rounds I wait before I assess a trend for a player and apply those points. At the Championships, there were 11 Players who had accrued enough of these slow play points to incur the Battlepoint penalty with some being penalised more than once. That’s just under 14% of all the players who were in attendance, which I believe is a great percentage to be at with how the game is currently. It’s mean that just over 86% of players are considering their army choice going into a tournament so that they’re able to get a full game with a natural conclusion within the given round times, which was 2 and a half hours. The tournament ‘standard’ for Australian 1850 Point events is between 2and a half to 3 hours per round, and most of the time player can get a full game in during that time.
Prizes
There was plenty on offer in terms of prizes in the form of some spectacular timber Trophies, Hobby Cases, Table Top gaming supplies, Miniatures, and Vouchers from various sponsors, which are the following:
- The 2nd Wave Podcast
- Frontline Gaming
- Titan Minatare Commission Painting
- Jolt Games
- Kromlech
- Powered Play Gaming
- Micro Arts Studio
With the contributions from these great Companies sponsoring the event, the prize pool was worth over $2300, which was all given out to the players in attendance. To start with, here’s the Prize Winners of the Australian Warhammer 40K ITC 2016 Championships:
1st Overall – Jeremy Martino of Menza Gaming
2nd Overall – Matthew Blair of Knights are OP
3rd Overall – Shawn Hollingsworth of Menza Gaming
Best General – Tom Bailey of Overwatch Wargaming
Renaissance Man – Adam Camilleri of The Mournvail
Best Painted – Sean Haigh of Maximum Joltage
Player’s Choice – Heath Burkill of Overwatch Wargaming
Best Sportsman – Jarrod Gregory
Encouragement Award – Craig Anderson of Overwatch Wargaming
Now, this list is going to be a long one, as it’s all the ITC 2016 Season Award recipients who were either Top in their Faction, Top 3 Teams or Top 5 Player’s for the ITC 2016 Season.
Top Faction Player’s:
- Adepta Soroitas – Alice Woodley
- Adeptus Astartes – Adam Naiper
- Astra Militarum – Adam Camilleri
- Blood Angels – Craig Anderson
- Chaos Daemons – Tom Bailey
- Chaos Renegades – Jack Kennard
- Chaos Space Marines – Iain Andrew
- Cult Mechanicus – Cody Willmott
- Dark Angels – Ben Rorison
- Dark Eldar – Michael Moore
- Deathwatch – David Hurley
- Eldar – David Jiang
- Eldar Corsairs – Bob Black
- Genestealer Cult – Chris Moore
- Grey Knights – Shawn Hollingsworth
- Harliquins – Erik Lathouras
- Imperial Knights – Stephen Ogilvie
- Renegade Knights – Jack Kennard
- Inquisition – Stephen Corfield
- Khorne Daemonkin – Michael Wood
- Militarum Tempestus – Michael Curtis
- Necrons – Shannon Patterson
- Officio Assassinorum – Chris Yates
- Orks – Matthew Wade
- Skitarii – Ben Zagami
- Space Wolves – Ewart Searle
- Tau Empire – Arawn Nicholson
- Tyranids – Kieren Howard
Top 3 Teams:
- 1st Place Team – Menza Gaming
- 2nd Place Team – Thunder from Down Under
- 3rd Place Team – Maximum Joltage
Top 5 Player’s
- 1st Overall – Jeremy Martino of Menza Gaming
- 2nd Overall – Arawn Nicholson of Maximum Joltage
- 3rd Overall – Adam Napier of Thunder from Down Under
- 4th Overall – Michael Hamilton of Team Madsnake
- 5th Overall – Iain Andrew of Knights are OP
It was very tight with some of the Top Player’s and some faction award as well with quite several upsets to who got awards and such as well, which can happen with the Championship event. We did Live Stream our Award Presentation on my podcast’s (The 2nd Wave Podcast) Facebook page, which you can check out here: https://www.facebook.com/The2ndWaveWP/. You can also check out a comprehensive article of the event from a Player’s perspective done by the guys over at Menza Gaming, which you can check it out here: http://menzagaming.net/cancon-2017-itc-2016-championships-weekend-review/
Wrap Up
To wrap up the whole TO’s report on the Australian Warhammer 40K ITC 2016 Championships, I’d have to say that it was an awesome event from a TO’s perspective! We had players from almost every state in Australian (WA and Tassie, com’ on guys, get over here next year aye!), and despite some of the issue we ran into, John, Myself and the rest of the Toing Team overcame them to kept on running the event as smoothly as possible for the players, which greatly showed through the thanks and feedback we have gotten from the players for the event. This tournament was the Largest Australian ITC Formatted event and considering we went from 1 event in the 2015 Season, to 20-30 events in the 2016 Season, it’ll continue to grow exponentially in the 2017 ITC Season, which as both a Player and TO is a positive sign to see the Australian 40K scene growing and thriving once again. Make sure you check out my Podcast, The 2nd Wave Podcast, and give us a Like on Facebook and Subscribe on iTunes (The 2nd Wave Warhammer 40K Podcast) as I’ll be doing plenty of coverage of the Australian ITC Season for 2017. Just want to throw a massive shout out to the Frontline Gaming guys for giving me the opportunity to do this article and I look forward to speaking to you in the future.
Hey guys, great writeup! Wow REECE take a look at this model. I know we have debated for days on these comment sections on the best ways to handle slow play, but I feel like our friends on the other side of the world may have figured out a system that is fair and reliable, and … you don’t have to spend 10 grand in chess clocks!!!
Bravo Gents!
Requires non collusion on the part of attendees to work. Its like the old requirement for events where you had to have painted your own army. Only the honest ever really get penalized. Also since it can hurt both players there is incentive for them to collude.
Granted its better than nothing, but is not going to magically fix the issue.
While it is true that some will lie, it is far more likely for the majority to be honest, because they would also be finishing the games or getting to turn 4 or more with less need to collude.
It is not perfect.. but I don’t think any one system is and that is ok. 🙂
I have brought this system up in comments before and I agree that it probably is the best way to go for a slow play penalty if it is needed. All self reporting is subject to collusion by the participants, so I really do not see a problem with that aspect.
Arawn is the best. Big ups to Titan Miniatures.
The slow system has its its pro’s and cons from what we have seen here in Australia. The system mentioned has a habit of punishing people that may not have been playing slow but have played against people who are either un-intentionally or deliberately slow, when this occurs its punishes both players for no real reason, that is the main issue we have experienced using the table. That being said Friday Night Gaming’s events have been using a slightly altered method that still uses the table but rather than apply it automatically after every turn it only gets implemented AFTER a complaint has been submitted and an investigation has taken place by the TO’s. We find that this works quite well as people still strive to avoid the threat of ‘Slow Play’, whilst at the same time we are not penalizing the unlucky people who just happened to be playing against slow opponents.